On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:20:38PM +0200, deadalnix wrote: [...] > I think you show a real need here, but I don't really like your > proposal. I'd advocate for recycling the comma operator for tuple > building.
+1. I know the topic of comma operator has been beaten to death several times over, but I'm curious, how much is it _actually_ being used outside of for loops? Would introducing (x,y,z) tuple syntax _really_ break a lot of code? Would it even break _any_ code? -- since tuple syntax would tend to be used where you normally don't use the comma operator. T -- Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. -- Napoleon Bonaparte