Le 17/05/2012 19:27, H. S. Teoh a écrit :
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:20:38PM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
I think you show a real need here, but I don't really like your
proposal. I'd advocate for recycling the comma operator for tuple
building.
+1.
I know the topic of comma operator has been beaten to death several
times over, but I'm curious, how much is it _actually_ being used
outside of for loops? Would introducing (x,y,z) tuple syntax _really_
break a lot of code? Would it even break _any_ code? -- since tuple
syntax would tend to be used where you normally don't use the comma
operator.
T
I'd advocate for the following behavior :
1/ void member of tuple are computed, but not stored in the tuple.
2/ A tuple with one member can unpack automagically.
With both, I'm pretty the code broken is close to none.
To go further, I advocate for declaration to be expression. It would
allow (int a, int b) = foo();
Which rox, as Andrei said :D
