Le 31/05/2012 09:49, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 5/31/12 12:28 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-30 21:58, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/30/12 12:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Ha, this is getting somewhere :D
It's getting where I was the whole time.
Andrei
No, the original problem was that you can synchronize on ALL objects,
regardless if they're marked with "synchronized" or not. This it how it
works today.
I was the whole time where TDPL is, which is not where the
implementation is today.
Andrei
And which isn't what dlang.org say too. You can agree that this is
confusing for everybody.
