On 5/30/12 12:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 30/05/2012 21:42, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 5/30/12 12:17 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 29/05/2012 23:33, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 5/29/12 1:37 AM, deadalnix wrote:
I would say that breaking things here, with the right deprecation
process, is the way to go.
So what should we use for mutex-based synchronization if we deprecate
synchronized classes?
Andrei
I missed that message. I don't think synchronized classes should go
away. I think synchronize on non synchronized classes should go away.
I agree.
Andrei
Ha, this is getting somewhere :D
It's getting where I was the whole time.
Andrei
