On Monday, 18 June 2012 at 15:21:36 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
So (**IMHO**) if that's really the case, we should really spend sometime fixing the /design/ of const before the implementation...This is mostly about the design of object initialisation.good idea or no?Certainly.
My initial instinct would be to require a "const constructor" in order for an object to be const-able, but I'm not sure if that would work correctly or not..