On 7/10/12 2:30 AM, Stefan Scholl wrote:
Caligo<iteronve...@gmail.com>  wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Stefan Scholl<ste...@no-spoon.de>  wrote:
"bearophile"<bearophileh...@lycos.com>  wrote:
I think Go is meant to be used mostly on 64 bit servers.

There aren't many people using Go on 32 bit systems. That's why there is
(was?) a big memory leak on these systems which wasn't caught early on.

There aren't many people using Go, period.

Don't know about this, but "Programming in Go" is a bad book (talks about
OO in Go and the author was clearly paid by number of words) but has a
higher ranking on Amazon than "The D Programming Language".

The book was released only in March; newer books usually have their highest rank during their first months. Also, TDPL has a paperback and a Kindle edition, which "compete" in rank with each other.

As an aside, Gedankenexperiment: imagine D were created at Google and Go were created by Walter. How would they have fared? I honestly think things would have been quite, um, different. I believe quite strongly is Go wouldn't have received any attention, and D would have been a riot.

And all the news sites and programmer blogs are nearly silent regarding D.

I agree that that's a problem, and it starts with us.


Andrei

Reply via email to