Am Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:42:13 +0200 schrieb Marco Leise <marco.le...@gmx.de>:
> Am Wed, 11 Jul 2012 22:58:07 +0200 > schrieb "bearophile" <bearophileh...@lycos.com>: > > > > => a = 5s; > > > > I read that as "5 seconds" :-( > > Me too, but then again "5l" could be read as 5 liters. I guess that is why > the move is towards uppercase suffixes. 5S and 5L are not likely misread. > > > I don't think your examples justify the increased language > > complexity. > > > > Bye, > > bearophile > > I understand that some of the examples have better alternatives. What I don't > understand is why you term this as increased language complexity. This is not > one of the "why not add" kind of requests. From my point of view the > complexity is already there through U, UL, I and UI. So completing the set > with B, UB, S and US seems only logical and solves an existing (attention: > buzzword ahead) ... *inconsistency*. ;) > > To cut a long story short; if I added those suffixes and made a pull request > would anyone be objected? P.S.: There is no I or UI, just L and UL. Sorry for the confusion. -- Marco
