On 7/23/12 5:14 PM, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:51:19 +0200, Stuart <stu...@gmx.com> wrote:
Saves us having to create a struct for every goddamn little function;
or using tuples directly, which means we have to refer to variables
like .value1 and .value2 instead of something meaningful.
You mean like this?
Tuple!(float, "x", float, "y") bar() {
return typeof(return)( 0.0, 0.0 );
}
auto xCoord = bar().x;
I dislike the typeof(return) in there, as assignment between tuples with
and without named fields works perfectly. Bring me the sky, Walter?
We could make
return tuple(0.0, 0.0);
to work. I can't imagine a scenario in which this relaxation would cause
a bug.
Andrei
