Philippe Sigaud:
Do you happen to still have the code, by any chance? I think
Phobos
could use a std.fsm
The code is not general enough for Phobos.
Kagamin:
I heard, gcc optimizer can tear functions into common pieces
and them reassemble the functions back from these pieces, or
simply inline them, won't you get the same result?
Sometimes those FSM are the only part of those small C or D
programs where I don't trust the optimizers. But thankfully in
C-GCC using a little of __builtin_expect() it's not necessary to
generate the assembly directly from the FSM description.
Bye,
beaophile
