On Monday, 30 July 2012 at 23:40:02 UTC, Stuart wrote:
I have no problem with DMD. DMD is a perfectly reasonable Windows executable. I am objecting to the frustrating way DFL is compile-it-yourself and doesn't work; and also the frustrating way there isn't a single working IDE or GUI designer for D.
If you're willing try yet another IDE, I use Code::Blocks on both windows and linux, and while the intellisense or whatever C::B calls it is usually a waste of time it is at least completely stable and integrates OK with ddbg (which itself is not perfect, but...). It recognizes D syntax and it doesn't take 5 minutes to start-up. People also seem to like Mono-D.
Like Dmitry said, rdmd can be a big help, since you just compile your main and it will find the dependencies.
