On 2012-08-04 21:08, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think that you should always be able to replace a variable with a
property. The other way around I'm not so sure. The problem is with
methods in classes. Since a method will be virtual by default you can't
just replace a property with a variable. That could potentially break
subclasses that override the property.
I wouldn't actually mind a way to do this, perhaps something like this:
class Foo
{
@property int bar:
}
Would be the same as:
class Foo
{
private int bar_:
@property int bar () { return bar_; }
@property int bar (int value) { return bar_ = value; }
}
--
/Jacob Carlborg
