On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 18:47:34 Johannes Pfau wrote: > Am Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:16:40 +0000 (UTC) > > schrieb trav...@phare.normalesup.org (Christophe Travert): > > If it where me, I would have the presently reviewed module > > std.hash.hash be called std.hash.digest, and leave room here for > > regular hash functions. In any case, I think regular hash HAVE to be > > in a std.hash module or package, because people looking for a regular > > hash function will look here first. > > std.hash.digest doesn't sound too bad. We could have std.hash.func (or > a better named module ;-) for general hash functions later.
I say just keep at simple and leave it at std.hash. It's plenty clear IMHO. - Jonathan M Davis