On Sunday, August 12, 2012 05:02:25 Marco Leise wrote: > I know that the Java way isn't perfect, because some lazy people write dummy > exception handlers to silence the errors, but its a worse solution to _not_ > notify the user of a function, that it potentially throws exceptions, I > think. So I wish D was explicit about thrown Exceptions.
It's becoming more universally accepted that while checked exceptions seem like a great idea up front, they're ultimately a bad idea: http://www.artima.com/intv/handcuffs.html D has nothrow, which statically verifies that _no_ exceptions are thrown, but that's as close as it's going to get to having checked exceptions. - Jonathan M Davis