On Friday, 17 August 2012 at 00:44:20 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2012 at 00:32:03 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
On Friday, 17 August 2012 at 00:10:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
In contrast, in D,
const ref Array!(T*) getStuff() const;
you would _know_ that not only is the container not altered,
but you know that the elements aren't altered either -
or anything which the elements point to.
I'm not so sure about that.
...snip...
Your example is not equivalent to what he was saying.
How?
Jon said "you know that the elements aren't altered either - or
anything which the elements point to".
I just showed that the const-ness of getStuff() tells you
_nothing_ about that fact.
Did I miss something?
