The discussion around new unified API for digest hash functions has subdued, just in time as the review period has ended.
Yes.
On Wednesday, 22 August 2012 at 12:36:08 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
- Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Jens Mueller
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) d_follower
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.dige... Jens Mueller
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.dige... Johannes Pfau
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.... Jens Mueller
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.... d_follower
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, ... Johannes Pfau
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Jesse Phillips
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Bernard Helyer
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Sönke Ludwig
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.digest) Oleg Kuporosov
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.dige... Manu
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.dige... Mike James
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, std.... Craig Dillabaugh
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (oops, ... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (o... bearophile
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (o... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: Vote for the new std.hash (o... David Gileadi
