On Monday, 17 September 2012 at 23:55:17 UTC, Ben Davis wrote:
On 17/09/2012 19:47, Jesse Phillips wrote:
a/1.txt
a/2.txt
a/b
a/b\1.txt
a/b\2.txt
a/c
a/c\1.txt
a/c\z
a/c\z\1.txt
These results also show a correct preorder depth-first search.
The bug report as it stands is misleading; should I post a
follow-up on the bug tracker, or should we close it and start
again?
You can probably just update. But I fail to see what is
missleading? Did I get the expected results wrong? Pre-order
depth first does not satisfy breadth first so what am I missin?
Sorry Im on a tablet making organization hard.
