On Tuesday, 18 September 2012 at 08:09:41 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is it any surprise the vast majority of *good* software is either open-source or otherwise non-commercial?

It is?

Every time I try to switch from Microsoft Office to Open/LibreOffice, I find them unusable. And those are probably the best alternatives.

Every time I try to switch from Windows to Ubuntu, GRUB belches at me, saying it thinks it's THE boot loader and it just cries like a baby about how it wants to install itself on the MBR. And it stops working randomly every once in a while when I put it on the partition boot sector.

Funny, the only times the Windows boot loader ever gets messed up is when I try to install Linux. Not when I happen to resize a random partition.

And if you tell me GIMP or Inkscape or whatever take the place of Adobe suites I'm just going to laugh.
Are they good? Sure.
Are the comparable with the commercial versions? Hell no.

Google Chrome? It's open-source, but it's driven by commercial interests -- it's driven by the advantages it gives Google in the market, even though it's "free" by itself.

Oh, and there's a reason people still use WinRAR instead of 7z, as great as 7-Zip is. (Yes, the icons and toolbars DO make a difference, even if you think that's stupid.)

In the programming world -- just look at how popular C# is.
It's not popular because it was open-source (although people tried to make Mono) -- it's popular because it's got damn good balance in terms of usability and IDE support.

And VS is a lot of $$$ to buy. Nothing open-source/non-commercial about it.


Of course, there's good open-source software. No doubt about that.

But at the moment I can't think of one that took the place of commercial software because people find it "good" and they find the commercial version "not good".


And let's not go into computer games and such...


Managed by *programmers*

LOL, that's precisely why open-source software has a "steep learning curve", as the creators like to put it.

It's a result of programmers not knowing (or caring) about making good UIs, so they just think the users are noobs when they can't use the software.

Reply via email to