On 2012-09-21, 21:29, Jonas Drewsen wrote:
A mentioned in the proposal (albeit not very clear) it requires non-templated function definitions to include both type and param names. If only one name is provided in a definition is always a param name. Unfortunately this is a breaking change for some code and that does speak against the proposal.
Not only is it a breaking change, it breaks one of the basic design desiderata of D - if it's valid C it either fails to compile or compiles with the same behavior as in C. -- Simen
