On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:28:15 Michel Fortin wrote: > Although to make things less confusing, I think the built-in language > tuple should give up its name. It could become a "sequence". Renaming > the built-in one would certainly be less trouble, as code doesn't refer > to it by its name, and you can pick a name that fits better with its > auto-expanding behaviour.
Not referred to by its name? It's refereed to as TypeTuple all over the place. It's arguably a bad name, but it would break a _lot_ of code to change it now. - Jonathan M Davis
