On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:06:33 +0200 "Peter Alexander" <peter.alexander...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The answer to that question is obvious: you should bother going > without because other languages provide other things that your > pet language does not (e.g. channels + simplicity in this case). > > Searching for a better language is a search like any other. > Hill-climbing is a poor search heuristic. Sometimes you have to > be willing to lose features to find the higher peaks. >
And sometimes I need to get work done instead of trying out all of the 100's of languages out there in some altruistic quest to be fair to everybody.
