Am Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:03:01 -0700 schrieb Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>:
> On Friday, October 19, 2012 05:14:44 Marco Leise wrote: > > Memory just isn't freed! > > That was my understanding, but the last time that I said that, Brad Roberts > said that it wasn't true, and that we should stop spreading that FUD, so I > don't know what the exact situation is, but it sounds like if that was true > in > the past, it's not true now. Regardless, it's clear that dmd still uses too > much memory in many cases, especially when code uses a lot of templates or > CTFE. > > - Jonathan M Davis He called it a FUD? Without trying to sound too patronizing, most D programmers would really only notice DMD's memory footprint when they use CTFE features. It is always Pegged, ctRegex, etc. that make the issue come up, never basic code. And preloading the Boehm collector showed that gigabytes of CTFE memory usage can still be brought down to a few hundred MB [citation needed]. I guess we can meet somewhere in the middle. Btw. did I mix up Don and Brad in the last post ? Who is working on the memory management ? -- Marco