On Sunday, 28 October 2012 at 14:11:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
...[keyboar died]
Yeah, sorry. I was saying that by just doing unit tests that do nothing more than declare the templates, you can get some very good compile coverage. It is not optimal, but it gives a good "bang for the buck", interms of invested effort (very little, just typing the types, but not testing anything).