On Sunday, 28 October 2012 at 14:11:41 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
 ...[keyboar died]

Yeah, sorry. I was saying that by just doing unit tests that do
nothing more than declare the templates, you can get some very
good compile coverage.

It is not optimal, but it gives a good "bang for the buck", in
terms of invested effort (very little, just typing the types, but not testing anything).

Reply via email to