On 11/02/2012 11:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:53:05 -0700
Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
On 11/2/2012 2:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I said the gap is getting thinner, not that is gone. It got
foreach, some form of CTFE, static assert, lambda to mention a few
new features.
No ranges. No purity. No immutability. No modules. No dynamic
closures. No mixins. Little CTFE. No slicing. No delegates. No
shared. No template symbolic arguments. No template string arguments.
No alias this.
No proper modules. No properties. Slow compilation. No reference
semantics for classes. No scope guards. Little default initialization.
Goofy ptr and func-ptr declaration syntax. Goofy rules about what
is/isn't virtual. Lots of undefined behavior. Forward declarations.
Things I'm not entirely certain about:
No IFTI?
IFTI is there.
No polysemous literals?
If I understand the term right, then 0 is polysemous.
No finally?
Good catch.
Also: No scope guards. No exception root type. No exception chaining, ...
