I'm sorry re-imposing a license fee
won't stop it. If all of us had to pay a fee it wouldn't even be a drop of
water in the bucket compared to what commercial groups could muster
up. Re-examination every 10 years would serve no purpose but to thin out
how many hams we have today. In a time when we aren't bringing in the
younger people to ham radio our voice to Government is getting weaker rather
than stronger which is what is sorely needed. Ok some people will say that
we have the ARRL to speak for us but many Amateurs don't belong to it for one
reason or another and this weakens their voice to the FCC. I myself just
recently went back to becoming a member even though I disagree with a lot of the
stuff they do. I feel that unless they can present a large voting block to
Congress and the FCC we could be in trouble down the road. Of course I
also believe that the ARRL needs to change to represent what the Amateur
community wants not what the board wants. This would mean that it is time
to change what we have so that the whole membership would vote for the board
members not the way it is done now.
Mike K1EG
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/ Yahoo! Groups Links
|
- Re: [digitalradio] FCC Doesn't Understand Mike/k1eg
- [digitalradio] Paying for your license? Rick Williams
- Re: [digitalradio] Paying for your license? Dean Gibson AE7Q
- Re: [digitalradio] Paying for your license? Mike/k1eg
- RE: [digitalradio] Paying for your license? Rick Williams
- Re: [digitalradio] FCC Doesn't Understand Joe Ivey
- RE: [digitalradio] FCC Doesn't Understand Bob DeHaney