Has the FCC waived the responsibility to avoid QRMing a station already on frequency?
I don't believe they have. It is the the licensee's responsibility, automatic or directly controlled, to toggle on the busy-frequency check or risk a FCC citation. This has been true way back to the earliest days of 2M packet networks. Have I missed something? > If the hard-coded sub-band only applied to automatic stations > without the ability to avoid QRMing a busy frequency, then > appropriately improving your protocol and software would allow you > to operate anywhere, subject only to bandwidth segmentation. > > 73, Dave, AA6YQ -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e |_|___|_| | | & | | {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| | |~_|~~~~| | -| | | ============\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html KD4E ===================================== West Central Florida ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/