Has the FCC waived the responsibility to avoid QRMing
a station already on frequency?

I don't believe they have.

It is the the licensee's responsibility, automatic or
directly controlled, to toggle on the busy-frequency
check or risk a FCC citation.

This has been true way back to the earliest days of
2M packet networks.

Have I missed something?

> If the hard-coded sub-band only applied to automatic stations 
> without the ability to avoid QRMing a busy frequency, then 
> appropriately improving your protocol and software would allow you 
> to operate anywhere, subject only to bandwidth segmentation.
> 
> 73,  Dave, AA6YQ


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e

            |_|___|_|
            | | & | |
               {|
       /\      {|
      /  \     {|
     /    \    {|
    /   @  \   {|
    |   |~_|~~~~|
    |   -| |    |
============\ #   http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html
      KD4E     =====================================
West Central Florida

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to