|
Thanks for sharing your direct experience from
UK, Canada and Australia.. on your voluntary bandplans..
I have personally also had direct experience with
these plans and found just like you all have found that they work exceedingly
well..
And of course, there is no good reason to think
that they would not work just as well in the USA...
__________________________________________________________ Howard S.
White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6 ex-AE6SM KY6LA Website: www.ky6la.com "No Good Deed Goes
Unpunished" "Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 San Diego Fires,
911"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 2:55
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] The UK Amateur
Radio Band Plan
For those who may be interested to know
80
metres
*********
3.500 to 3.510 CW DX
portion
3.500 to 3.560 CW band
allocation
3.560 to 3.585 Novice portion
3.580
to 3.620 CW and digital modes
3.620 to
3.800 Phone allocation and CW
3.775 to
3.800 Phone DX portion
I cannot recall when I last
heard anyone using CW in the phone section
20
metres
*********
14.000 to 14.069 CW portion
14.070 to
14.099 digital modes
14.099 to 14.101 beacons
14.101
to 14.112 digital mail boxes etc
14.112 to 14.350 phone
allocation and CW
14.125 to 14.300 SSB contest
allocation
14.225 to 14.235 SSTV/fax allocation
Once again
I cannot recall the last time I heard CW in the phone SSB
section.
This plan has been in force for many years and as far as
most
operators are concerned the allocations of band space work quite
satisfactorily. Having read most of the comments regarding what are
called sub-bands, not subbands, it is difficult to understand why
there should be any conflicts of
interests.
G0GQK
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [digitalradio] The UK Amateur Radio Band Plan Dr. Howard S. White
-
