Why not do the same for all rather then just a few?
At 08:52 PM 2/8/06, you wrote: >The primary concern - that automatic stations will QRM ongoing QSOs - > could be monitored by anyone capable of copying CW, assuming >compliance with the CW identification requirement. > >To deal with the hopefully small number of automatic stations who >choose to ignore the CW identification and/or commercial content >rules, some fraction of the OOs would need the ability to decode all >commonly used automatic protocols. Total cost would be modest, and >one would think that this would be a perfect use of ARRL funds, but >should they initially decline, there would be alternatives. > > 73, > > Dave, AA6YQ Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
