A misstatement of that magnitude is hardly a nit. Its a foundation of
her argument!
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> And I suppose that nit-picking every statement made by others on
the reflector
> is to be considered responsible behavior? GIVE ME A BREAK!
>
> 73,
>
> Chuck
>
> At 01:19 PM 8/26/2006, you wrote:
>
> >Bonnie claimed that amateur radio had devolved to random QSOs.
Since
> >amateur radio began with random QSOs and random QSOs remain a
> >significant component of amateur communications today, that claim
is
> >false. If the original post was on topic, then correcting its
factual
> >errors must also be on topic.
> >
> >The premises and context on which we make technical decisions are
> >critical. Leaving errors and misrepresentations unchallenged would
be
> >irresponsible.
> >
> >73,
> >
> >Dave, AA6YQ
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
