A question for you, Patrick: in your opinion, is the public documentation for Pactor 2 and Pactor 3 sufficient to allow you to build your own implementations?
73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > >Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time > >for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet > >to packet that must be maintained? > The second proposal is the good one. > > >Is it possible that one could write a sound card program that could monitor Pactor II/III > >transmissions even if it can't interoperate with the SCS TNC? > If the (detailed) specifications of Pactor II and III were public, it would be possible to monitor these transmissions (but not work them, for the same problem as for Pactor 1). > > 73 > Patrick > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org Other areas of interest: The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/ DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion) Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/