A question for you, Patrick: in your opinion, is the public 
documentation for Pactor 2 and Pactor 3 sufficient to allow you to 
build your own implementations?

   73,

       Dave, AA6YQ
    

--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> 
> >Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time
> >for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet
> >to packet that must be maintained? 
> The second proposal is the good one.
> 
> >Is it possible that one could write a sound card program that 
could monitor Pactor II/III
> >transmissions even if it can't interoperate with the SCS TNC?
> If the (detailed) specifications of Pactor II and III were public, 
it would be possible to monitor these transmissions (but not work 
them, for the same problem as for Pactor 1). 
> 
> 73
> Patrick
>  
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to  Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org

Other areas of interest:

The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol  (band plan policy discussion)

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to