I thought we decided somebody else said that? (HI)
Chris Imlay worked pretty hard for us. He was able to get
an FCC consensus on encryption being OK for Hams to use
when the FCC staff in the SAME office had somewhat different
views on the same subject!
I don't know what the ARRL pays him, but he earned his
wage that day! He also gets impatient with some of the
nit picking questions Hams ask, so I am "forced" to like him (HI).
Vy 73,
John
K8OCL
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Getting RFSM2400 Approved for US Hams
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:54:49 -0000
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John,
I thought you said, "Kill all the lawyers", guess that does not
include the ARRL legal staff..
Prohibitions are fairly simple; and no, that is not the same
as "permissions" :)
73 es be well,
Bill N9DSJ
{snipped for brevity}
> As for RFSM2400, I am unaware of any specific prohibitions
> by the FCC, but that isn't the same as permission, or so I
> was told. I would like to try it out someday, so I would
> first get it posted to the ARRL Standards page, then I
> would discuss it with Chris Imlay, and if he was cool with
> it, I would go ahead and use it.
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know what to post! Can anybody
> (Bonnie?) give me the protocol / standard and I will talk
> to the appropriateARRL webmaster at the League and get
> it posted. After that I will send the URL to the League's legal
> guru and ask to schedule a discussion meeting with him.
{snipped)
