That's your call, Danny. ----Original Message Follows---- From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:29 -0400
Outside the envelope - Outside the ham bands. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years each . QSL LOTW-buro- direct As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you use that - also pls upload to LOTW or hard card. moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:27 AM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption > Bonnie has done a great job of providing a list, but there > are some more BIG ones! > > 1. List of names of confirmed survivors. > 2. List of names of confirmed dead. > 3. List of names of known injured. > 4. Estimated number of dead and injured. > > There are many more situations where Hams would want to pass > such info along to meal providers, the Red Cross, Salvation Army, > and some assurance the client would get the information BEFORE > they watch it in CNN! > > Come on folks! Think outside the envelope. These are post 9-11 times! > We are at war! Wake up. Times have changed. > > MARS (all Hams) is already using or prepared to use encryption. > ARES and RACES can't be far behind. > > John - K8OCL > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "expeditionradio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption > Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:07:07 -0000 > > > Bill N9DSJ wrote: > > Can see no valid reason for encryption on our frequencies. If one > > could provide an single example I would be interested...... > > Hi Bill, > > Hams should certainly have the capability to pass over-the-air > encrypted traffic or scrambled speech for emergencies and disaster > relief. There are other situations where it would be useful, too. In > order to have seamless capability in an emergency, hams should be > familiar and proficient with the use of it on a regular basis. > > Encryption should not be with the sole intent to obscure the content > from other hams, but it should be availble to hams when there is a > need to shield sensitive data and information from evil-doers. > > Here are a few reasons for hams to use limited encryption in the > over-the-air communication: > > 1. To shield private data > 2. To shield private telephone numbers > 3. To shield sensitive email addresses > 4. To shield system passwords > 5. To shield station remote control > 6. To secure access to stations > 7. To control satellites > 8. To shield messages sent by a 3rd party to ham > 9. To protect medical information > 10. To protect 3rd party traffic requiring confidentiality > 11. To control repeaters > 12. To shield identities of children > > I'm sure there are more reasons... but that's some of the things I > thought of in the few minutes it took to write this. > > Bonnie KQ6XA > > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster telnet://cluster.dynalias.org > > Our other groups: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/ > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97 > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/778 - Release Date: 4/27/2007 1:39 PM > >