Thanks, Andy. Is there a way to filter the posts, for example to see only
ops currently QRV in Contestia and DominoEX?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-----Original Message-----
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:56 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] web site where users about to call CQ in a
particular mode
I have such a web site Dave, but not used much these days.
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
Click on "digital radio"
Andy
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Dave AA6YQ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One way to increase exposure to the less popular digital modes would be to
> setup a web site where users about to call CQ in a particular mode could
> post their frequency. So when I want to give Contestia a try, I could
search
> this site for active Contestia ops and know where to QSY and point my
> antenna.
>
> The DX Cluster network could be used for this purpose, but some users
> dislike self-spotting.
>
> 73,
>
> Dave, AA6YQ
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Patrick Lindecker
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:06 PM
> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
>
> Hello all,
>
> Just to say that aside to Olivia, you have a mode which name is Contestia,
> which is twice quicker than Olivia and almost as sensitive. It is built on
> the same principle as Olivia but with different parameters and a reduced
set
> of characters.
>
> It is present at least on Mixw and Multipsk
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 3:35 PM
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology
>
>> --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Dave AA6YQ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On what basis do you claim that Olivia, DominoEX, and MFSK are
>> "better" than
>>> PSK for ragchewing? Olivia is slow, and MFSK is difficult to tune.
>>
>> I could care less about "mode envy" but I will say that I enjoy both
>> Olivia and MFSK16. Both are much more tolerant of poor band conditions
>> than PSK and who cares if Olivia is slow - you're talking about
>> ragchewing, not contesting. Too, I haven't found MFSK16 hard to tune
>> at all. I'm using MultiPSK so perhaps it depends on the software
>> implementation. I'm aware that both use more bandwidth and have a lack
>> of panoramic decoding but again, we aren't talking about contesting.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
>> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>>
>> Check our other Yahoo Groups....
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Andy K3UK
www.obriensweb.com
(QSL via N2RJ)
