> I plan to propose (in the next Multipsk version) a possibility to route 
> the
> voice to the output of a second sound card, so to simplify the use for 
> blind
> Hams.

I admire that Patrick. You certainly deserve praise for your work.

Thanks...

Tony, K2MO

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk's "Voice" mode (+JT65 vocalization)


> Hello Tony,
>
>> Thanks for the info on the Voice mode. I've noticed that the vocalization
>> audio is sent to the sound card output that goes to the rig. Is there a
>> way
>> to route it to the PC speakers instead?
> I plan to propose (in the next Multipsk version) a possibility to route 
> the
> voice to the output of a second sound card, so to simplify the use for 
> blind
> Hams.
>
> Note: for the moment, it is proposed in English (Central American accent)
> and in French (my parisian accent), but it could be proposed to any 
> language
> (I've done a small program to give the possibility to build the acoustic
> characters dictionnary).
>
> 73
> Patrick
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2008 6:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk's "Voice" mode
>
>
>> Patrick,
>>
>> Thanks for the info on the Voice mode. I've noticed that the vocalization
>> audio is sent to the sound card output that goes to the rig. Is there a
>> way
>> to route it to the PC speakers instead?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tony, K2MO
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 6:14 PM
>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Multipsk's "Voice" mode
>>
>>
>>> Hello Tony and all,
>>>
>>> Yes Voice is done for blind or partially sighted Hams (very sensitive 
>>> and
>>> automatic tuning). I added the same system in JT65, but in JT65 it is
>>> simpler as you need only the Function keys (F1 to F12) to do the QSO.
>>>
>>> In Voice and JT65, characters can be repeated to the speaker as soon as
>>> they
>>> are received.
>>>
>>>>That would allow speech with any  mode.
>>> On any mode which throughput is equal or less than 120 characters/minute
>>> as
>>> one half of second is the minimum to pronounce a letter.
>>>
>>> 73
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com>
>>> Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2008 10:18 PM
>>> Subject: [digitalradio] Multipsk's "Voice" mode
>>>
>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Just learned about Multipsk's "Voice" mode thanks to Sholto (KE7HPV).
>>>> It's
>>>> an Olivia mode derivative that uses 8 tones with a bandwidth of 168 Hz.
>>>> It's
>>>> called Voice because it has the ability to vocalize incoming 
>>>> characters.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure Patrick developed the mode with sightless hams in mind and I
>>>> thought I'd mention it here since I believe there are a few sightless
>>>> hams
>>>> on this reflector.
>>>>
>>>> It might be an undertaking, but it would seem that this could be taken 
>>>> a
>>>> step further by linking the incoming digital mode text to a
>>>> text-to-speech
>>>> program or something along those lines. That would allow speech with 
>>>> any
>>>> mode.
>>>>
>>>> Just a thought.
>>>>
>>>> Tony, K2MO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
>>>> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>>>>
>>>> 30M digital activity at http://www.projectsandparts.com/30m
>>>>
>>>> Recommended software : DM780, Multipsk, FLDIGI, Winwarbler ,MMVARI.
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
>> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked
>>
>> 30M digital activity at http://www.projectsandparts.com/30m
>>
>> Recommended software : DM780, Multipsk, FLDIGI, Winwarbler ,MMVARI.
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> 

Reply via email to