>>>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:05:36 -0000, "obrienaj" <k3uka...@gmail.com> said:
> In the few ROS 16 and ROS 1 tests that I have dome so far... > ROS 16 seems similar to Olivia 8/1000 , good performance but perhaps a > not quite as good as Olivia under QRM or deep fades. > ROS 1 , not as good as JT65A in very poor conditions. > Anyone else have impressions, perhaps I am wrong... these are on-air > impressions not lab tests. I wonder if there are any test results (or even on-air impressions substantially different from Andy's) to explain what looks like the proverbial elephant in the living room from where I'm standing... i.e., the fact that ROS is > 2000 Hz while Olivia nn/1000 and JT65A are 1000 and < 200 Hz respectively. Or is it now somehow cool to do the same thing as before but with a 2x-12x larger footprint on the bands? -- 73, Stelios, M0GLD.