Hello Dave, AF6AS, "IIRC" what does it stand for?
There has to be enough information to at least reverse-engineer a mode by the FCC (and the NSA). Is that documented somewhere, not that I want to question the statement or you..... What about something like: "Those need to be able to read/decode it under all circumstances " 73 Rein W6SZ -----Original Message----- >From: Dave Sparks <dspa...@pobox.com> >Sent: Jun 2, 2010 2:14 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP > >Oops, I missed that. > >What I *THOUGHT* you were saying is that you tried making a call (to a station >with the current release) and succeeded. You might only be able to >communicate with stations within a narrow range of release numbers near to the >one you possess. > >I do think that demands for source code might be unnecessary, but IIRC a >complete specification of the protocol is necessary. That's why PACTOR is >legal. There has to be enough information to at least reverse-engineer a mode >by the FCC (and the NSA). > >-- >Dave - AF6AS > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Becker, WØJAB" > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:58 AM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP > > > > > I think that is what I said below now in RED > By my call I mean W0JAB > > > At 12:44 PM 6/2/2010, you wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > But since I have it on a flash drive I did install it on the laptop and > > gave it a call other then my call and it worked fine. > > > > What do you think? > > > > I think even Ray Charles could see that. > > > > > > Jose, if I'm wrong in any way - feel free to > > jump in here and make any needed corrections. > > I'd be surprised if your version were still compatible with the current > version. Did you try making up a call and trying to put that in the > program, just to make sure that it is your specific call that terminates > the > program and not any other random call? > > -- > Dave > AF6AS > > > >
