I see that these at least, 14075.3 14075.9 are also used by JT65-HF and JT8. I haven't checked the others in you list. Jon
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien <k3uka...@...> wrote: > > Skip et al, > > > Settling on a sensible list of frequencies will take some studying > FYI.. Here is a list of specific frequencies used by Winlink HF > stations, May 2010 list. Many have multiple stations using the > particular frequency. The list is world-wide. > > 3565 > 3569 > 3580 > 3583.5 > 3587.2 > 3589 > 3590 > 3591 > 3591.5 > 3592.5 > 3593 > 3593.5 > 3595 > 3595.9 > 3596 > 3598 > 3603 > 3604.5 > 3605 > 3608.5 > 3611.9 > 3613 > 3613.5 > 3615 > 3617.5 > 3620.2 > 3624.3 > 3627.7 > 3643 > 7035.4 > 7036.9 > 7037 > 7038.7 > 7040.9 > 7043 > 7043.5 > 7043.9 > 7046.7 > 7049 > 7050 > 7051 > 7051.4 > 7051.5 > 7052.5 > 7053 > 7063.9 > 7065.9 > 7066.9 > 7067.9 > 7068.3 > 7068.9 > 7069.5 > 7070.9 > 7071.9 > 7074.9 > 7075 > 7075.4 > 7076.9 > 7090.5 > 7091 > 7092 > 7094 > 7096.5 > 7098.5 > 7101.2 > 7101.7 > 7101.9 > 7103.5 > 7103.7 > 7104.4 > 7107 > 10110 > 10116.2 > 10118.5 > 10122.9 > 10127 > 10127.9 > 10133.9 > 10135.4 > 10136.9 > 10138 > 10139.5 > 10140 > 10141 > 10141.2 > 10142 > 10142.7 > 10143.4 > 10143.7 > 10144 > 10144.5 > 10145 > 10145.5 > 10145.9 > 10146.2 > 10146.5 > 10147.5 > 10147.7 > 10148.2 > 10148.5 > 14062 > 14064 > 14064.9 > 14065.9 > 14066.9 > 14068.9 > 14069.4 > 14074.9 > 14075.3 > 14075.9 > 14088.2 > 14089 > 14094.9 > 14095.9 > 14096.2 > 14097.5 > 14098.5 > 14098.7 > 14101.7 > 14102.4 > 14102.7 > 14103 > 14104.2 > 14105 > 14106 > 14106.7 > 14107.4 > 14108.5 > 14108.9 > 14109.2 > 14110 > 14110.4 > 14111 > 14111.9 > 14112 > 14112.4 > 14112.5 > 14113.5 > 14114 > 14115 > 14115.5 > 14117.9 > 14124 > 14127.5 > 18075.4 > 18097 > 18100.9 > 18101.9 > 18102.9 > 18106.2 > 18106.5 > 18106.7 > 18106.9 > 18107 > 18107.9 > 18108 > 18111 > 18113.8 > 18116.5 > 18124 > 18126.5 > 21074.9 > 21075.4 > 21091.2 > 21098 > 21098.7 > 21111 > 21117.9 > 21122.5 > 21126.5 > 21183 > 21298.7 > 24939 > 28133 > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Dave AA6YQ <aa...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > +++ More AA6YQ comments below > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on > > Behalf Of KH6TY > > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:02 PM > > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor > > > > >>>Its my impression that the WinMOR busy frequency detector has been > > well-characterized as effective (going back to its original deployment in > > SCAMP), so its not clear to me why more evaluation is required. >
