Hi Dave, Why don't we try to meet this thing head on, instead of saying too difficult, too boring, fed up and tired of talking, thinking about it. Please lets move on, there are other digital methods, why not just use those?
73 Rein W6SZ -----Original Message----- >From: Dave Wright <hfradio...@gmail.com> >Sent: Jul 12, 2010 7:25 PM >To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Moving ROS forward in the USA? > >Sigi, > >Have to agree with you here. > >Since Spread Spectrum is not authorized in the US below 220MHz, and since >CHIP 64/128 is Spread Spectrum, no one in the US can use MultiPSK since it >includes CHIP??????? Well, of course, that isn't the case. Logic would have >to prevail, but with the negativity towards ROS, everyone in the US would be >better off just staying away from it except about 220MHz. > >Dave >K3DCW > > > >On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Siegfried Jackstien < >siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de> wrote: > >> >> >> That would mean if you would implement ros or similar in a multimode soft >> like multipsk or dm780 you would not be allowed to use it (the whole soft) >> in us ??? I think if only a part of the soft is forbidden to use (on >> transmit) all other modes can be used >> >> If for instance rtty was forbidden in germany but no other mode I can use >> all other modes in a given software >> >> So if in us ros hf is forbidden (but not ros mf) you could use it in us … >> right?? >> >> Just my understanding of laws ,, but I may be wrong >> >> Sigi >> >> >> >> > > > >-- >Dave >K3DCW >www.k3dcw.net > >"Real radio bounces off of the sky"
