So 10 times is not a property of SS. Yes

73 Rein W6SZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: W2XJ <w...@w2xj.net>
>Sent: Jul 13, 2010 8:46 PM
>To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Random data vs Spread Spectrum
>
>It is generally accepted that 10 times bandwidth is the minimum necessary to
>achieve enough processing gain to make the use of SS worthwhile.
>
>
>On 7/13/10 3:55 PM, "J. Moen" <j...@jwmoen.com> wrote:
>
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>    
>> 
>>  
>> There's the generally accepted definition of SS, quoted below and referring 
>> to
>> bandwidths greatly exceeding what's necessary, and then there's the way the
>> FCC regs are written, which do not refer to that definition.
>>  
>> I think just about everyone, or maybe absolutely everyone who cares about the
>> FCC regs, thinks in this case they are inappropriate, but the fact is, they 
>> do
>> not allow for narrow-band SS, even though it would cause no real harm.
>>  
>> The regs should be changed, but until they are, we in the US can not use SS
>> below 220, or we can move to another country, or we can violate the regs,
>> and/or we can campaign to change them.  But saying you don't agree with a law
>> so you don't have to follow it is not the right way.
>>  
>>   Jim - K6JM
>>  
>>>  
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>  
>>> From:  rein...@ix.netcom.com
>>>  
>>> To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
>>>  
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:23  AM
>>>  
>>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Random  data vs Spread Spectrum
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hi Alan, 
>>> 
>>> Why did you wait so long with contributing here?
>>> Please  explain.
>>> 
>>> ++ In Feb of this year I quoted from the ARRL's Spread  Spectrum Source book
>>> page 5-2 ++
>>> 
>>> " Spread Spectrum Fundamentals  "
>>> 
>>> SS systems employ radio frequency bandwidths that greatly exceed the
>>> bandwidth necessary
>>> to convey the intelligence.
>>> 
>>> Bandwidths for SS  systems generally run from 10 to 100 times the 
>>> information
>>> rate.
>>> 
>>> etc  etc.
>>> 
>>> I got shouted out of the Group by addressing the use of ROS in the  US by 
>>> the
>>> experts on
>>> SS.
>>> 
>>> 73 Rein W6SZ
>>  
>>    
>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to