________________________________
From: J. Moen <j...@jwmoen.com>
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 8:33:06 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Olivia vs. RTTY vs. PSK & spectrum efficiency
I completely understand the lure of the old mechanical teleprinters. But I
have
to say I was surprised at my reaction to the addition of RTTY to the firmware
in
my NUE-PSK modem.
I typically use the NUE-PSK battery powered plugged into my 817 while doing QRP
in the field. I don't need to lug along a laptop to do PSK31. Apparently it
was easy for them to add RTTY support, and by golly, I found myself doing the
occasionally RTTY QSO using this little device. And it was fun.
I would not have guessed a modern little device like the NUE-PSK would ever
support RTTY, and I would not have guessed I'd get a kick out of it. I mean, I
still prefer other digital modes, but RTTY once in a while can be fun too, I've
discovered.
Jim - K6JM
>I have an old mechanical printer that dates back to around 1945. Still works
>fine. I let it run just to watch it work. Sometimes it is interisting to
>compair the print of the old 1970 something homebuilt modem and mechanical
>printer with the modern sound card programs.
>The NUE-PSK should not be hard to impliment rtty on. I wrote a program to run
>on an 8080 processor board that only had 1 K of ram and 2 K of rom in it about
>30 years ago. I did have an external modem to convert the tones to pulses.
>Same one that worked the mechanical printer.
>
>While the NUE-PSK looks interisting, I have a small netbook computer that will
>run all the sound card programs. If you have to have a keyboard, the netbook
>is
>not much larger with its 10 inch screen. . A small interface box handles the
>audio interface.