Hi, On Sun, Nov 09, 2025 at 08:45:23AM +1100, Kevin Koster wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > Rodrigo Arias <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >Got inspired to do a little vibecoding on @dillo to see how hard it > >> >would be to get native Mac menus. > >> > >> I'm afraid I won't read code aided or generated by a chatbot. It is also > >> a legal liability as the license of that code is not clear. > >> > >> They are literally destroying whatever was that remained of the Web, > >> causing many sites to stop working in Dillo due to the JS-walls. > > > > Strongly agree. I propose a small change to the website to clarify this > > position for future contributors: > > > > --- a/dillo-browser.org.html Sat Nov 8 09:11:31 2025 > > +++ b/dillo-browser.org.html Sat Nov 8 09:12:41 2025 > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ table { margin: 1.5em; } > > <li>Helps authors to comply with web standards by using the > > <a href="old/help/bug_meter.html">bug meter</a> > > <img alt="Bugmeter icon" style="vertical-align:middle" > > src="img/bugmeter.png">.</li> > > + <li>100% human-made. No AI or LLM is used to create Dillo.</li> > > </ul> > > <p> > > Read the <a href="user_help.html">user manual</a> to discover how to > > use > > I take such things too literally, I know, but FWIW to me this > implies the project only accepts code that is verifiably human > generated, which is hard to do. You'd need the maintainer watching > over your shoulder while you write it or something. > > Something like "AI-generated code contributions are not accepted" > would inform contributors without implying the ability to verify > the unverifiable.
Thanks, I will consider adding some contribution guidelines. Eventually, I'm afraid that we will be unable to recognize honest contributions. Best, Rodrigo. _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
