On 1/2/06, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having the "intermediate" port using GDK sounds nice, > but I think the final "native" LiTE/DirectFB port would > not benefit from it and be finished later. > > So it depends on the need of this intermediate version. > We could also have to ports right from the beginning, the > GDK port would be finished first, the other could run in > parallel, by someone not working on the LiTE/DirectFB port :)
Yes, I don't know how much one could really reuse from the gdk port concerning a DirectFB/LiTE port, as it's better to map the primitives and events directly. But this could be a parallel effort, those who like GTK/Gdk could do this port, and those who want a native DirectFB/LiTE port could do it. I mean, we could always clone the gdk version and rewrite it inside out, or take the BeOS or a similar simple starting point. We just need to be gentle with LiTE and not change the internal structures, unless they have bugs, rather extend it, that's OK. --Kent _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
