On 1/3/06, Unger Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * If the primary goal is code size then I definately agree with you, one can > do much better than mozilla. However, I think 12MB for Minimo is not bad -> > they specifically target machines with 32-64MB RAM, and that's a hit for > modern IPTV / Digital Satelite STBs and low cost Home Theatre PCs, which is > the area I am interested in.
As I know the RSS for Minimo/Mozilla is 70Mb and more, so it would push concerning how much RAM you have available. Maybe they've optimized it since 0.2....? > IMHO, "choice" is a good thing, so lets get as many browsers running under > DFB as we can!! :) Yes, this is open source, after all. I don't mind multiple ports, it's actually desirable, the best ones will bubble up based on the experience, performance numbers, and so on... --Kent _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
