On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:36:11PM +0100, Philip Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:45:49PM +0300, Jorma Tuomainen wrote:
> > DirectFB, DirectDB-extra and xine-lib. Also 2.6.17.1 kernel with
> > those couple patches for g400(clock and mem, IIRC).
> 
> A paranthetical query: is there any reason these g400 patches haven't
> been applied upstream yet? They've been hanging around in the directfb
> CVS for a long time (years?).

The full memory patch will never go upstream as is. Someone would 
first have to fix matroxfb's accel code to handle the full 32MB.

The clock patch IMO could be applied. IIRC I did send it to the 
matroxfb maintainer when I first made it but he was concerned about 
changing the code for older cards when he didn't have anything to test 
it with.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/

_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users

Reply via email to