That more or less suggests some kind of corruption, or a non-fit of LiTE onto DirectFB. I now really suggest to debug into DirectFB and see where it is going.. So get sources and compile with --enable-debug. For the looks of it, it should not be able to throw that error, if compiled correctly. It's normally only thrown on IDirectFB::GetInterface and the like.
hth Niels Paul Eipper wrote: > 2009/2/9 Niels Roest <ni...@directfb.org>: > >> No idea.. >> There is a mechanism of locating and loading implementations of >> not-implemented interfaces, but that should not hit in in your case. I'd >> recommend to just try make clean - make - make install. I noticed you >> mention DirectFB 1.0.1, that also means you are using an older version of >> LiTE, I assume. You can try with the latest in both cases.. As a last >> suggestion, you can try to recompile DirectFB with "--enable debug" when >> configuring, and then start with "debug" in your directfbrc to look for >> clues. >> >> Greets >> Niels >> > > Digging around a little, I now get this error: > > (#) DirectFBError [window_new: Surface->GetSubSurface]: No (suitable) > implementation found! > > seems there is no implementation for GetSubSurface (?!). What > determines the implementations? Strange that it only happens when > trying to run from LiTE, whereas if I run a dfb demo (like > df_databuffer) that uses GetSubSurface it runs correctly. > > -- .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-users mailing list directfb-users@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users
