Oopps still getting hold of gmail...plz ignore my previous reply....
Anyways.....

> I hope with stgfx2 :-)
Yes...on the mb441 board....Also the QT demo media player app is much
more smoother now...

> Using DSCAPS_VIDEO, you force DirectFB to allocate from framebuffer
> memory. Otherwise DFB might decide to use system memory, via simple
> malloc().
In the case of multiple DFB applications where all the surfaces are
created as primary and with video caps...would it not lead to
flikering updates to the screen
as all window surfaces are created on fb.

> Using fusion, you can run multiple independent DirectFB applications at
> the same time. The same holds true for QT applications when QT uses DFB
> as a back end.
Does fusion also allocate memory for surfaces...is it true that fusion
shared memory is mmaped at the same location
in each applications address spaces

>
>
> HTH,
> Andre'
>
>
Regards,
M.
_______________________________________________
directfb-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-users

Reply via email to