FYI
Now, we should decide how to proceed. Think the choices are;
1) we take his advice and write the plugin,
2) we give him advice and he writes the plugin
Option 1 requires more effort on our side it and I, at the moment, can't
afford it - so, it would need a volounteer. We probably could pospone every
further strategical choice (about merging efforts) after this first
integration step.
Opinions?
Ciao,
R
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on
DirectMemory
To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]>
On 09.11.11 00:10, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote:
> This is not so different from an indexed file, just it is in memory -
maybe
> you could take a look at the code (which is fairly simple) and get back to
> us with some more targeted questions.
I understand that the plugin is supposed to be added as an auxiliary
cache module, right? If so, the IndexedDiskCache could be used as a
template. How do you suggest we proceed?
Bye, Thomas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
