I could help with option 1 if we decide to go that route. -Mir
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Raffaele P. Guidi < [email protected]> wrote: > FYI > > Now, we should decide how to proceed. Think the choices are; > > 1) we take his advice and write the plugin, > 2) we give him advice and he writes the plugin > > Option 1 requires more effort on our side it and I, at the moment, can't > afford it - so, it would need a volounteer. We probably could pospone every > further strategical choice (about merging efforts) after this first > integration step. > > Opinions? > > Ciao, > R > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Thomas Vandahl <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:03 PM > Subject: Re: [JCS] - proposal on a off-heap plugin for JCS based on > DirectMemory > To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > > On 09.11.11 00:10, Raffaele P. Guidi wrote: > > This is not so different from an indexed file, just it is in memory - > maybe > > you could take a look at the code (which is fairly simple) and get back > to > > us with some more targeted questions. > > I understand that the plugin is supposed to be added as an auxiliary > cache module, right? If so, the IndexedDiskCache could be used as a > template. How do you suggest we proceed? > > Bye, Thomas. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >
