nice idea indeed :) going to do work on it a while while working... :P
-Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > why not share you changes in your github fork ? > Will ease grab changes and test those. > > 2012/2/22 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: >> Bonjour, >> >> +1 for 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT, we've changed enough things and maybe we'll >> continue doing it - as next step, there are generics, see >> DIRECTMEMORY-43 >> >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Sorry I missed the thread. >>> I should push it :-) we will discuss after. >>> >>> I'd like to be able to do something like myFactory (or an other name) >>> .getRegion(name).put etc... >>> >>> BTW as we are introducing some changes what about bump version to >>> 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT ? >>> >>> 2012/2/21 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>: >>>> Salut Olivier! >>>> >>>> I already proposed, some days ago - but looks like Daniel Manzke only >>>> took me seriously - an idea how to describe the configuration and the >>>> "factory". >>>> >>>> I invite you having a look at it if you didn't, because fits with what >>>> you described. Please see it on DIRECTMEMORY-62. >>>> >>>> Of course my proposal has to be enriched with regions, but I already >>>> have the impl on my machine. >>>> >>>> Simo >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >>>> http://www.99soft.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Currently Solr test failed due to a chicken and eggs issue. >>>>> >>>>> private static CacheService cacheService = new CacheServiceImpl( >>>>> getMemoryManager() ); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> public static void init( int numberOfBuffers, int size, int >>>>> initialCapacity, int concurrencyLevel ) >>>>> { >>>>> cacheService.init( numberOfBuffers, size, initialCapacity, >>>>> concurrencyLevel ); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> public static MemoryManagerService getMemoryManager() >>>>> { >>>>> return cacheService.getMemoryManager(); >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> This Cache class is a bit confuse IMHO. >>>>> What is the purpose of this class exactly ? it looks to duplicate >>>>> CacheServiceImpl. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder about having like CacheFactory (or an other name) with a >>>>> DirectMemoryConfiguration class. I would prefer change the current >>>>> Cache class with that. >>>>> >>>>> class DirectMemoryConfiguration { >>>>> List<CacheRegion> cacheRegions; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> class CacheRegion { >>>>> String name; >>>>> int numberOfBuffers; >>>>> int size; >>>>> int initialCapacity; >>>>> int concurrencyLevel, >>>>> String memoryManagerClazz; // optionnal >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Basically this will instantiate a CacheServiceImpl per cacheRegion. >>>>> >>>>> BTW after we can talk about a configuration file mechanism. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT ? >>>>> >>>>> Lemme if that makes sense for you. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Olivier Lamy >>>>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >>>>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Olivier Lamy >>> Talend: http://coders.talend.com >>> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
