Sorry, I don't understand how it is related to declaring a package in the SVN repo that's not org.apache.*
Thanks anyway, having 3rd parties dependencies that adhere to ASL2.0 simplifies the release process. bets, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Michael André Pearce <[email protected]> wrote: > http://ehcache.org/apidocs/ > > See point 14, code is released under apache license already and approved by > asf. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 25 Feb 2012, at 15:35, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Salut Benoit! >> >>> But, EHCache is done in a way that net.sf.ehcache.Cache is looking for >>> the class net.sf.ehcache.store.offheap.OffHeapStore >>> (http://ehcache.org/xref/net/sf/ehcache/Cache.html#1181). >> >> Ouch :( :( Cannot believe they didn't adopt a SPI-alike approach :( >> >> Looks like we don't have any chance to change/hack that behavior, so >> we can just understand how to having it fixed under the legal PoV. >> >> Thanks for the clarification, very appreciated! >> >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/
