A Dimecres 28 Maig 2008, Shawn (Red Mop) va escriure: > A pair of workaround options: These options are similar in result, but > differing in implementation. > > Option 1: Maintain a mirror of the data on the server, say, rsync from > /home to another local disk, then run dirvish on that data. This is > expensive on disk space, but easiest to setup.
Ok, but then I have my backup in the same box. > Option 2: Take an LVM snapshot /home, then back up from the snapshot. > > Neither fixes the speed problem, but both allow backing up of unchanging > data. I don't understand very well this. Please, could you explain it and what is for? > > Some more things to try > if the icy box isn't mounted by anything else, try mounting nfs with > nolock. You can also no_subtree_check on the icy box. Ok, but if I could execute rsync in the icy box, it would be better? > This also suggests making your rsize/wsize smaller... > http://osdir.com/ml/nfs/2003-03/msg00119.html uff, ok. The question is it worse while. Really, this thread have done a lot of material!!!! Thanks. Leo PS. the options in the mount and export doesn't do much more :-( -- -- Linux User 152692 PGP: 0xF944807E Catalonia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dirvish mailing list [email protected] http://www.dirvish.org/mailman/listinfo/dirvish
